Invest in Russia — invest in Russian regions!
All analytics

Integrated Marine Management in the Arctic

Research
4 April 2019

In recent years, the Arctic Council (AC) has been discussing the ways to improve marine management in the Arctic Ocean on the basis of the ecosystem approach. However, the implementation of principles of ecosystem-based marine management requires handling of challenging issues in this field. First, the boundaries of ecosystems do not generally correspond to the limits of national jurisdiction of the coastal states. Secondly, it is necessary to provide optimal integration of the regional marine spatial planning measures with the work of sectoral international organizations. Thirdly, the development of integrated ecosystem-based marine management in the Arctic requires comprehensive consolidation of relevant scientific efforts.


Since sovereignty, jurisdiction and sovereign rights of the Arctic states extend to significant parts, but not the entire Arctic Ocean, the authority of the Arctic Council to adopt decisions, restricting third states’ rights in maritime ABNJ (Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction), is limited. However, the authors believe that the AC as a regional authoritative mechanism could play the central role in this process while expanding and institutionalizing coordination and cooperation with the global and regional sectoral organizations and arrangements in place in the Arctic.

Synergy effects could be increased by establishing within the AC (or under its auspices) of a regional program aimed at systematic planning, coordination and integration of scientific research for the purpose of introducing integrated approach to marine management, developing recommendations related to spatial planning to inform decisions adopted by the Ministerial meetings of the Council after consideration by the SAO (Arctic Council’s Senior Arctic Officials), and task-orientation of the cooperation between the relevant bodies of the AC and national and international scientific organizations conducting integrated research in the Arctic (such as the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES), the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC)). Addressing these goals is possible both through gradual enhancement of the focused work of the Arctic Council in the above-mentioned fields, without fundamental changes of its structure and methods, as well as through significant expansion of the mandates of its bodies, in particular endowing the AC with international legal personality, transforming the AC Secretariat into Commission of the AC with relevant mandate or creating a special subsidiary body.

Regulation of other types of economic activities that fall out of mandates of existing global or regional sectoral organizations, but that could have potential adverse impact on marine ecosystems and biodiversity of the region, is possible on the basis of regional agreements between the member states of the Arctic Council aimed at resolving specific problems, which would be open for accession by third states. In this process the Arctic Council could make use of such resource as broad number of the observer states, which could take part in discussions on relevant regional regulations in task forces established for this purpose.

According to the authors, efficient implementation of spatial planning and integrated marine management is possible only in case of enhancing cohesion among the member states of the Arctic Council. Along with active participation of national scientific organizations in the relevant work of the Council, holding regular meetings of the AC member states’ ministers responsible for environmental protection and science issues and inviting heads of relevant ministries of the observer states, holding of Arctic summits, establishing the practice of regular consultations of representatives from the member states of the Arctic Council to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) with involvement of representatives from the AC observer states could significantly contribute to achieving this end.

Anlytics on the topic

All analytics
Research
30 August 2021
Russian Arctic Policy: International Aspects

The report, prepared by experts of National Research University Higher School of Economics for the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, discusses the development of the Arctic as a flagship region with an innovative resource and eco-friendly economy, as well as the international priorities of Russia in the Arctic.

Analytical digest
20 November 2020
Green Agenda and International Trade: From Contradictions to Opportunities

The study prepared by ITI in collaboration with the Roscongress Foundation shows main trajectories of environmental agenda in global trade.

Expert opinion
27 April 2020
An opportunity for tourism in the Russian Arctic

Tourism is one of the sectors most heavily affected by COVID-19. Experts believe that the industry will undergo significant restructuring, with travel abroad giving way to domestic tourism, and trips to places where people don’t gather in large numbers becoming more popular. According to Managing Director of the 21st Century Arctic International Union Valery Korovkin, current circumstances offer a chance to develop a new tourist destination. It is an area that has been discussed for a long time, but which little is currently being done to promote. Arctic tourism is a potentially highly profitable business from the perspective of federal and regional budgets, and has long been successfully exploited by other coastal nations.


Research
29 May 2019
Geology for the future. The development of World ocean resources

The study was prepared by Rosgeologia and is focused at the geological study and assessment of the mineral and raw material potential of the World ocean.